RFR: JDK-8233591: Reorder jpackage help text to focus on package
Kevin Rushforth
kevin.rushforth at oracle.com
Mon Nov 11 14:12:29 UTC 2019
OK.
-- Kevin
On 11/9/2019 11:46 AM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> My point was to add consistency. We used to have class names in camel
> case and pascal case (className, ClassName) and this didn't look right
> for me. I agree ClassName, `mypkg` is more appropriate. I'm neutral
> about myJar.jar and MyJar.jar.
>
> - Alexey
>
> On 11/9/2019 12:37 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> I disagree with a couple of these changes, but they can be fixed in a
>> subsequent pass, since you've already pushed the changes.
>>
>> By convention, class names are camel case with leading upper-case
>> letter, so ClassName expresses that better than className. Similarly,
>> MyJar.jar seems better to me than myJar.jar. By convention, package
>> names don't have upper-case letters at all, so package.name or
>> `mypkg` might be better than packageName.
>>
>> -- Kevin
>>
>> On 11/9/2019 2:50 AM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>>> Looks good.
>>>
>>> - Alexey
>>>
>>> On 11/8/2019 4:31 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>>> revised [3] as per below suggestions.
>>>>
>>>> [3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8233591/webrev.03
>>>>
>>>> /Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/8/2019 4:07 PM, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
>>>>> This is minor and not directly related to this change, but looks
>>>>> like we have inconsistency in names in Sample usages.
>>>>> Names used: modulePath, ModulePath, moduleName, className,
>>>>> moduleName/ClassName, moduleName/className, package.ClassName,
>>>>> inputdir, MyJar.jar, appRuntimeImage, name, <app image dir>.
>>>>> I'd suggest the following changes if we are touching this section
>>>>> of help anyways:
>>>>> package.ClassName -> packageName.className
>>>>> MyJar.jar -> myJar.jar
>>>>> inputdir -> inputDir
>>>>> ModulePath -> modulePath
>>>>> moduleName/ClassName -> moduleName/className
>>>>> <app image dir> -> appImageDir
>>>>>
>>>>> - Alexey
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/8/2019 3:41 PM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>>>>> Please review the revised jpackage fix for bug [1] at [2].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open
>>>>>> sandbox repository (jpackage).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This fix (webrev.02) was revised after feedback from webrev.01.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233591
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8233591/webrev.02/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list