RFR of JDK-8134599: Improve the code coverage for ThreadLocal

[David Holmes]

Hi Hamlin,

On 15/10/2019 12:03 pm, Hamlin Li wrote:
> Could some help to review it?

Basic test seems okay but a few minor suggestions:

1. Please add a public summary to the bug report to convey the same 
information as:

27  * @summary per latest JDK code coverage report, 2 methods 
replaceStaleEntry
   28  *          and prevIndex in ThreadLocal.ThreadLocalMap is not touched
   29  *          by any JDK regression tests, this is to trigger the 
code path.

2. In that comment s/is not/are not/

3. Please add a brief comment to the code explaining how the test 
exercises the previously untested methods.

No need to see an updated webrev for the above.

Thanks,
David

> Thank you
> 
> -Hamlin
> 
> On 2019/9/4 3:16 PM, Hamlin Li wrote:
>> Would you please review the following patch?
>>
>> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8209824
>>
>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mli/8209824/webrev.00/
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -Hamlin
>>