RFR: 8231186: Replace html tag <code>foo</code> with javadoc tag {@code foo} in java.base

[Brent Christian]

FWIW, I also noticed this for

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jboes/webrevs/8231186/webrev.02/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/SecurityManager.java.sdiff.html

-B

On 9/18/19 11:32 AM, naoto.sato at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Julia,
> 
> This is not a comment to changes you've made, but the webrev seems 
> missing some diffs, e.g.,
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jboes/webrevs/8231186/webrev.02/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/Calendar.java.sdiff.html 
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jboes/webrevs/8231186/webrev.02/src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/ResourceBundle.java.sdiff.html 
> 
> 
> Not checked all, so there may be some other blank diffs. Could be a bug 
> in the tool.
> 
> Naoto
> 
> On 9/18/19 8:47 AM, Julia Boes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This change replaces the HTML code tag with the equivalent javadoc tag 
>> in the java.base module as such:
>>
>> <code>foo</code> becomes {@code foo}
>>
>> Ignored are any code tags that enclose other HTML or javadoc tags or 
>> that contain HTML entities, e.g. character codes.
>>
>>
>> Examples (after change):
>>
>> java.base/share/classes/java/nio/charset/spi/CharsetProvider.java
>>
>> 51 * ignored.  The comment character is {@code '#'} 
>> (<code>'\u0023'</code>); on
>>
>> java.base/share/classes/java/io/File.java
>>
>> 625 * <code>new File(this.{@link #getCanonicalPath})</code>.
>>
>>
>> I reviewed the change with specdiff and doccheck on the java.base 
>> module, neither flagged any differences or errors. I also reviewed the 
>> javadoc of some classes manually but did not do an extensive manual 
>> review.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231186
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jboes/webrevs/8231186/webrev.02/
>>
>>
>> The copyright year will be updated before generating the changeset.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Julia
>>