RFR (14) 8235837: Memory access API refinements

[Andrew Haley]

On 1/15/20 6:48 PM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> That said, even w/o that performance fix, I wouldn't expect the memory 
> access API to be 4x slower. I'd start by dropping the acquire() [which 
> you probably don't need and it's doing a CAS], and moving to indexed var 
> handle (by replicating the benchmark code linked above) and see if that 
> works better.

OK, I never found the indexed var handle.

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671