RFR: 8237521: Memory Access API fixes for 32-bit

Maurizio Cimadamore maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Fri Jan 24 11:56:42 UTC 2020


Changes to the Java code looks fine to me - (and the overall approach in 
Unsafe seems sensible, but I'll defer to David for that)

Thanks
Maurizio

On 24/01/2020 09:58, Nick Gasson wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 01/24/20 14:35 pm, David Holmes wrote:
>>> How about we align the size up to ADDRESS_SIZE (== HeapWordSize) in
>>> Unsafe.allocateMemory() before the call to allocateMemoryChecks(). Like:
>>>
>>>     bytes = ((bytes + ADDRESS_SIZE - 1) & ~(ADDRESS_SIZE - 1));
>>>
>>> Then it will throw an IllegalArgumentException if the result is outside
>>> the size_t range. And in the native code we can just assert that the
>>> `size' argument is already aligned:
>>>
>>>     assert(is_aligned(sz, HeapWordSize), "sz not aligned");
>> That seems quite reasonable.
>>
> I've done this here:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ngasson/8237521/webrev.02/
>
> Need to check bytes >= 0 before aligning up so that allocateMemory(-1)
> still throws an IllegalArgumentException.
>
> Tested with jdk_foreign and runtime/Unsafe/.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nick


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list