RFR: 8247532: Records deserialization is slow
Peter Levart
peter.levart at gmail.com
Mon Jun 15 09:06:32 UTC 2020
Hi Chris,
Maybe I stamped "Enchancement" just because it does not represent a
logical bug, but 16x regression compared to the same feature with
classes could be characterized as performance "bug", right?
Peter
On 6/15/20 10:37 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> Thank you for doing this, it is really appreciated. I’m going to take
> this patch and run it in my local environment, after which I’ll post a
> reply here.
>
> > So WDYT? Since this is still a preview feature in JDK15, is it
> possible to squeeze it into JDK15?
>
> I think that such a change is a reasonable candidate for consideration
> in RDP 1. I see that the issue in JIRA is currently an Enhancement. Is
> it really an enhancement? If so, then it can follow the LERP [1].
> Otherwise, if a regular bug between P1-P3 (inclusive), it can be
> integrated when reviewed and ready.
>
> -Chris.
>
> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/3#Late-Enhancement-Request-Process
>
>> On 14 Jun 2020, at 22:34, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com
>> <mailto:peter.levart at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> So, here's new webrev incorporating Johannes' suggestion:
>>
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk-dev/RecordsDeserialization/webrev.02/
>>
>
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list