RFR: 8247532: Records deserialization is slow

[Chris Hegarty]

> On 15 Jun 2020, at 10:06, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> Maybe I stamped "Enchancement" just because it does not represent a logical bug, but 16x regression compared to the same feature with classes could be characterized as performance "bug", right?

That would be the categorisation that I would use.

-Chris.

> 
> Peter
> 
> On 6/15/20 10:37 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>> 
>> Thank you for doing this, it is really appreciated. I’m going to take this patch and run it in my local environment, after which I’ll post a reply here.
>> 
>> > So WDYT? Since this is still a preview feature in JDK15, is it possible to squeeze it into JDK15?
>> 
>> I think that such a change is a reasonable candidate for consideration in RDP 1. I see that the issue in JIRA is currently an Enhancement. Is it really an enhancement? If so, then it can follow the LERP [1]. Otherwise, if a regular bug between P1-P3 (inclusive), it can be integrated when reviewed and ready.
>> 
>> -Chris.
>> 
>> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/3#Late-Enhancement-Request-Process <https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/3#Late-Enhancement-Request-Process>
>> 
>>> On 14 Jun 2020, at 22:34, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com <mailto:peter.levart at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So, here's new webrev incorporating Johannes' suggestion:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk-dev/RecordsDeserialization/webrev.02/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/jdk-dev/RecordsDeserialization/webrev.02/>
>>> 
>> 
>