Sponsor Request: 8241097: java/math/BigInteger/largeMemory/SymmetricRangeTests.java requires -XX:+CompactStrings
Brian Burkhalter
brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Wed Mar 18 21:29:45 UTC 2020
The change has been pushed [1].
Brian
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/af221c1b1671
> On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:52 PM, Brent Christian <brent.christian at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Adding -XX:+CompactStrings seems reasonable to me. (And I think it's a betters solution than, say, increasing -Xmx to allow running without compact strings.)
>
> -Brent
>
> On 3/17/20 10:46 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
>> OK, I am fine with that. I’ll leave it open for the moment though in case anyone else has a comment.
>> Brian
>>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 10:39 AM, Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I see what you mean, but it's not really the point of the the BigInteger test, which is testing for an Arithmetic exception:
>>> The problem test is the one for 8021204 which constructs a String of "0"'s 2*31 long! which if you use 2bytes for each "0" is very likely to run out of memory! The problem is a "bug" in the testcase in that it doesn't quite ensure the environment is capable of running the test, by ensuring 1byte per char helps ensure that. Hotspot is that by default. I also suspect OOME is not certain either necessarily.
>>>
>>> Andrew Leonard
>>> Java Runtimes Development
>>> IBM Hursley
>>> IBM United Kingdom Ltd
>>> internet email: andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Brian Burkhalter <brian.burkhalter at oracle.com>
>>> To: Andrew Leonard <andrew_m_leonard at uk.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Java Core Libs <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>>> Date: 17/03/2020 15:48
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Sponsor Request: 8241097: java/math/BigInteger/largeMemory/SymmetricRangeTests.java requires -XX:+CompactStrings
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To clarify, could the compact strings setting be detected and maybe add another @run tag and expect an OOME? Not sure this is critical.
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Brian Burkhalter <brian.burkhalter at oracle.com <mailto:brian.burkhalter at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You’re welcome.
>>>
>>> I see. Let’s leave this hang out a bit for further comment. Also, is a test possible, or a modification of an existing test?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list