RFR: 8261847: performace of java.lang.Record::toString should be improved

[Glavo]

On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 09:45:56 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов <duke at openjdk.java.net> wrote:

>> Please review this PR which aims to optimize the implementation of the `toString` method we provide for records. A benchmark comparing the implementation we are providing for records with lombok found out that lombok is much faster mainly because our implementation uses `String::format`. This fix is basically delegating on StringConcatFactory::makeConcatWithConstants which is faster.
>> 
>> TIA
>> 
>> This is the result of the benchmark comparing records to lombok with vanilla JDK:
>> 
>> Benchmark                          Mode  Cnt    Score    Error  Units
>> MyBenchmark.base                   avgt    4    0.849 ±  0.111  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.equals_record          avgt    4    7.343 ±  2.740  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.equals_value           avgt    4    6.644 ±  1.920  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.record_hash_code       avgt    4    5.763 ±  3.882  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.record_to_string       avgt    4  262.626 ± 12.574  ns/op               <------ Before
>> MyBenchmark.value_class_to_string  avgt    4   30.325 ± 21.389  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.value_hash_code        avgt    4    5.048 ±  3.936  ns/op
>> 
>> 
>> after this patch:
>> 
>> Benchmark                          Mode  Cnt   Score   Error  Units
>> MyBenchmark.base                   avgt    4   0.680 ± 0.185  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.equals_record          avgt    4   5.599 ± 1.348  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.equals_value           avgt    4   5.718 ± 4.633  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.record_hash_code       avgt    4   4.628 ± 4.368  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.record_to_string       avgt    4  26.791 ± 1.817  ns/op                 <------- After
>> MyBenchmark.value_class_to_string  avgt    4  35.473 ± 2.626  ns/op
>> MyBenchmark.value_hash_code        avgt    4   6.152 ± 5.101  ns/op
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/runtime/ObjectMethods.java line 264:
> 
>> 262:                 .map(g -> g.type().returnType())
>> 263:                 .toList()
>> 264:                 .toArray(new Class<?>[getters.length]);
> 
> Why not `new Class[0]`? It's likely to be faster, isn't it?

(I'm not reviewer.)

I think `.toArray(Class<?>[]::new)` should be better here. `.toList` seems unnecessary.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6403