RFR: 8288899: java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService/CloseTest.java failed with "InterruptedException: sleep interrupted" [v4]
Viktor Klang
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 17 10:05:35 UTC 2023
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:52:00 GMT, Doug Lea <dl at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Addresses Jdk 8288899 : java/util/concurrent/ExecutorService/CloseTest.java failed with "InterruptedException: sleep interrupted" and related issues.
>>
>> This is a major ForkJoin update (and hard to review -- sorry) that finally addresses incompatibilities between ExecutorService and ForkJoinPool (which claims to implement it), with the goal of avoiding continuing bug reports and incompatibilities. Doing this required reworking internal control to use phaser/seqlock-style versioning schemes (affecting nearly every method) that ensure consistent data structures and actions without requiring global synchronization or locking on every task execution that would massively degrade performance. The previous lack of a solution to this was the main reason for these incompatibilities.
>
> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 45 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - Update @since tags
> - resync
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - ExecutorService tests
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - Rework versioning
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8288899
> - ... and 35 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/a26bcff0...585769c9
src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 721:
> 719: * they are ignored, and 0 is an OK default.) The scan in method
> 720: * helpJoin uses these markers to try to find a worker to help
> 721: * (i.e., steal back a task from and execute it) that could makje
Suggestion:
* (i.e., steal back a task from and execute it) that could make
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14301#discussion_r1296996791
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list