RFR: 8307194: Enhance static-libs-image
Erik Joelsson
erikj at openjdk.org
Wed May 3 13:37:15 UTC 2023
On Wed, 3 May 2023 02:09:22 GMT, Jiangli Zhou <jiangli at openjdk.org> wrote:
> This PR is branched from the makefile changes for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8303796 and contains the following for handling the JDK/VM static libraries:
>
> - Create libjvm.a together with other JDK static libraries when building 'static-libs-image' (or 'static-libs-bundles') target, include it in 'images/static-libs/lib';
> - For libjvm.a specifically, exclude operator_new.o;
> - Filter out "external" .o files (those are the .o files included from a different JDK library and needed when creating the .so shared library only) from .a libraries; That's to avoid linker errors due to the duplicate symbols problems from the related .o files;
> - Handle long arguments case for static build in make/common/NativeCompilation.gmk;
> - Address @erikj79's comment in https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/13709#discussion_r1180750185 for LIBJLI_STATIC_EXCLUDE_OBJS;
The current target user of the .a libraries is GraalVM, so we should check with them that the changes to the contents of the `.a` files isn't impacting them in a bad way. @dougxc what do you think?
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13768#issuecomment-1533040157
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list