RFR: 8305457: Implement java.io.IO
Naoto Sato
naoto at openjdk.org
Tue May 7 16:37:55 UTC 2024
On Mon, 6 May 2024 21:45:12 GMT, Pavel Rappo <prappo at openjdk.org> wrote:
> Please review this PR which introduces the `java.io.IO` top-level class and three methods to `java.io.Console` for [Implicitly Declared Classes and Instance Main Methods (Third Preview)].
>
> This PR has been obtained as `git merge --squash` of a now obsolete [draft PR].
>
> [Implicitly Declared Classes and Instance Main Methods (Third Preview)]: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8323335
> [draft PR]: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/18921
Looks good overall. Left some minor comments.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/Console.java line 189:
> 187: /**
> 188: * Writes a prompt as if by calling {@code print}, then reads a single line
> 189: * of text from this system console.
Nit: I would not add `system` here as `this console` is consistent with other locations.
src/java.base/share/classes/java/io/ProxyingConsole.java line 107:
> 105: * {@inheritDoc}
> 106: *
> 107: * @throws IOError {@inheritDoc}
Probably I am missing something, but I see `Console` declares this throws clause. Do we need this inheritDoc here?
test/jdk/java/io/IO/IO.java line 99:
> 97: System.getProperty("test.jdk") + "/bin/java",
> 98: "--enable-preview",
> 99: "-Djdk.console=gibberish",
The test comment suggests this test is testing the default console implementation, but the invocation specifies `-Djdk.console=gibberish` which defaults to java.base. Is this what you intended?
test/jdk/java/io/IO/Input.java line 33:
> 31: System.out.print(readln("?"));
> 32: }
> 33: }
Needs a newline
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19112#pullrequestreview-2041904750
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19112#discussion_r1591704961
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19112#discussion_r1592764263
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19112#discussion_r1592773917
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19112#discussion_r1592776068
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list