RFR: 8339538: Wrong timeout computations in DnsClient

Daniel Fuchs dfuchs at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 6 17:01:08 UTC 2024


On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 16:28:36 GMT, Aleksei Efimov <aefimov at openjdk.org> wrote:

> This PR proposes the following changes to address wrong timeout computations in the `com.sun.jndi.dns.DnsClient`:
> - The `DnsClient` has been updated to use a monotonic high-resolution (nano) clock. The existing `Timeout` test has also been updated to use the nano clock to measure observed timeout value.
> 
> - The left timeout computation has been fixed to decrease the timeout value during each retry attempt. A new test, `TimeoutWithEmptyDatagrams`, has been added to test it.
> 
> - The `DnsClient.blockingReceive` has been updated:
>     - to detect if any data is received
>     - to avoid contention with `Selector.close()` that could be called by a cleaner thread
> 
> - The expected timeout calculation in the `Timeout` test has been updated to take into account the minimum retry timeout (50ms). Additionally, the max allowed difference between the observed timeout and the expected one has been increased from 50% to 67%. Taking into account 50 ms retry timeout decrease the maximum allowed difference is effectively set to 61%. This change is expected to improve the stability of the `Timeout` test which has been seen to fail [intermittentlly](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8220213). If no objections, I'm planning to close [JDK-8220213](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8220213) as duplicate of this one.
> 
> JNDI/DNS jtreg tests has been executed multiple times (500+) to check if the new and the modified tests are stable. No failures been observed (so far?).

test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/dns/ConfigTests/TimeoutWithEmptyDatagrams.java line 62:

> 60:     private static final int DNS_CLIENT_MIN_TIMEOUT = 50;
> 61: 
> 62:     private long startTime;

startTime does not need to be an instance variable: consider removing it and make it a local variable in the runTest() method.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/20892#discussion_r1747445029


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list