RFR: 8297271: AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags should be specific to class file version [v5]

Tue Apr 29 20:08:46 UTC 2025

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:59:46 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Unfortunately the cffv-aware maskToAccessFlags introduction and old maskToAccessFlags migration to reject STRICTFP are bundled together - this means javap will need an ad-hoc facility to parse instead of using these APIs. Is that the way to go?

If there's hard dependency, as in depending on new APIs; ok as is.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24760#issuecomment-2840112813