RFR: 8297271: AccessFlag.maskToAccessFlags should be specific to class file version [v5]

[Chen Liang]

On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 19:48:01 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Take the class file version to reject flags not yet defined, redefined, or obsoleted. This is useful for clients like javap to report the correct undefined flags for different class file versions.
>> 
>> A preparatory patch for javap to pass around the ClassFileFormatVersion to parse flags is available at #24955.
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 11 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse
>  - Wording updates
>  - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse
>  - Missing since
>  - Fix javap causing strictfp tests to fail
>  - Further furnish docs
>  - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse
>  - Merge branch 'feature/af-location-accessors' into feature/af-cffv-parse
>  - Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/openjdk/jdk into feature/af-cffv-parse
>  - Redundant method
>  - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1a22005e...41989440

Rolling back to draft while this waits for the javap changes.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24760#issuecomment-2840298105