RFR: 8366178: Implement JEP 526: Lazy Constants (Second Preview) [v25]
Per Minborg
pminborg at openjdk.org
Fri Nov 14 14:44:49 UTC 2025
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:02:05 GMT, Jorn Vernee <jvernee at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 112 commits:
>>
>> - Clarify toString spec
>> - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-constants
>> - Add @AOTSafeClassInitializer
>> - Address comments in PR
>> - Fix merge mistake
>> - Merge master
>> - Rework toString implementations
>> - Update after doc comments
>> - Merge branch 'master' into lazy-constants
>> - Revert the AbstractMap.keySet @Stable annotation
>> - ... and 102 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/76a1109d...1f439bec
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/LazyCollections.java line 66:
>
>> 64: // using `elements.length`.
>> 65: @Stable
>> 66: private final int size;
>
> Is this really that important? What about the extra footprint added by the `int` field? We might have many instances of this class, but only one copy of the bytecode.
Hrrm. I wonder if the C2 compiler will end up producing equivalent code for the two variants? But there are merits to your argument.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27605#discussion_r2527753354
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list