[crac] RFR: Add CRaC-specific tests to GHA [v5]

[Anton Kozlov]

The message from this sender included one or more files
which could not be scanned for virus detection; do not
open these files unless you are certain of the sender's intent.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:10:56 GMT, Radim Vansa <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Existing GitHub Actions run test tier1 but since most changes in this project focus on the CRaC capabilities we should run them in an automated fashion, too.
>> Right now the tests are mostly failing: this should be addressed in https://github.com/openjdk/crac/pull/47
>
> Radim Vansa has updated the pull request incrementally with 16 additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Finally fix ResolveTest
>  - Add seemingly non-vital logs
>  - Revert all debug info and hope for the best
>  - what's wrong with cppath
>  - Fix path
>  - fix path
>  - Fix criu SHA256
>  - Print dump log
>  - Use newer criu
>  - Debug failing ResolveTest in GHA
>  - ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/crac/compare/04996e37...1f9645ee

test/jdk/jdk/crac/java/net/InetAddress/ResolveTest.java line 105:

> 103:         // not be able to restore the process.
> 104:         // This workaround should not be necessary when https://github.com/openjdk/crac/pull/46
> 105:         // is integrated.

I propose to wait until #46 is integrated and remove the mention (and workaround)

test/jdk/jdk/crac/java/net/InetAddress/ResolveTest.java line 107:

> 105:         // is integrated.
> 106:         List<String> javaCmd = new ArrayList<>();
> 107:         javaCmd.addAll(Arrays.asList("/jdk/bin/java", "-cp", "/test-classes/", "-XX:CRaCCheckpointTo=/cr"));

This looks belonging to #50. Could this be the reason for strange failures of this test I've reported there?

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/48