Format for JDK 6/7 changeset comments?

[Andreas Sterbenz]

iris.clark at sun.com wrote:
> 
>   For example:
> 
>      4853841: Nervous text demo displays wrong version [iris, duke]
> 
> This covers the common information but is that sufficient?  I think

I agree with your proposal (<id>: <synopsis>), but I believe that all 
supplemental information about the bug should not be placed in the 
changeset comments but in the bug database. That includes the names of the 
reviewers. It is important that all information about a bug is collected 
in one place, not two or three. That place needs to be the bug database.

Andreas.