PING: IcedTea project

[Iris Clark]

Hi, Andrew.

Sorry for the delay.  I'm up to my eyeballs trying to tease out the key issues in the Developer Workflow discussion.

As the only Member of the IcedTea Project (http://openjdk.java.net/census#icedtea), you have a degenerate case of consensus voting.  As the only Reviewer/Committer (which you are by virtue of being the Lead), you can appoint whomever you want.

I've forwarded this message to the registrar so that your appointments can be recorded.

Thanks,
iris

-----Original Message-----
From: Dr Andrew John Hughes [mailto:ahughes at redhat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:14 AM
To: discuss at openjdk.java.net
Cc: mr at oracle.com
Subject: PING: IcedTea project

On 17:20 Fri 06 Jan     , Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> According to the OpenJDK census,
> 
> http://openjdk.java.net/census#andrew
> 
> I'm the lead for the IcedTea project.  The bylaws state that
> 
> 'When a Project is created then its initial Project Lead, once 
> selected, appoints the initial Authors, Committers, and Reviewers.'
> 
> http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#project-lead
> 
> How do I go about appointing these positions?  I'd like to do so as 
> follows, reflecting existing work on IcedTea:
> 
> aph: reviewer
> dbhole: committer
> omajid: committer
> ptisnovs: committer
> chrisphi: committer
> 

Can I have a response on this, please?
--
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07