What is the status of Zero on OpenJDK 7

[Gary Benson]

Michael Franz wrote:
> I was able to get past this by upgrading to llvm 2.6 (Fedora 11 as
> 2.5).  I see post referencing llvm 2.7.  Is this going to be the
> required version soon?

There's no plans for that.  In the past we've generally supported as
many versions as developers cared about.

> I am building on a G4 which is 32 bits, but _LP64=1 is being
> defined.  This is causing problems as jlong is being defined
> incorrectly (long instead of long long).  How do I unset _LP64?

What does 'uname -m' say on your machine?

Cheers,
Gary

-- 
http://gbenson.net/