What is the status of Zero on OpenJDK 7

[Michael Franz]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com> wrote:

> Michael Franz wrote:
> > I was able to get past this by upgrading to llvm 2.6 (Fedora 11 as
> > 2.5).  I see post referencing llvm 2.7.  Is this going to be the
> > required version soon?
>
> There's no plans for that.  In the past we've generally supported as
> many versions as developers cared about.
>
> > I am building on a G4 which is 32 bits, but _LP64=1 is being
> > defined.  This is causing problems as jlong is being defined
> > incorrectly (long instead of long long).  How do I unset _LP64?
>
> What does 'uname -m' say on your machine?
>
> uname -m
ppc

I was able to get the build to progress by setting ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32 before
calling make.  I did this since there didn't seem to be a case where the
ARCH was equal to ppc and it then defaults to 64.

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20091111/2ba720c1/attachment.html