/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5: Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset...

[Andrew Haley]

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com>:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2009/9/1  <langel at icedtea.classpath.org>:
>>>
>>>> changeset 503129230ba0 in /hg/release/icedtea6-1.5
>>>> details:
>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5?cmd=changeset;node=503129230ba0
>>>> author: langel
>>>> date: Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>
>>>>       Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset d0593233c9ce
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> diffstat:
>>>>
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>> .hgtags |    1 +
>>>>
>>>> diffs (8 lines):
>>>>
>>>> diff -r d0593233c9ce -r 503129230ba0 .hgtags
>>>> --- a/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:08 2009 -0400
>>>> +++ b/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2
>>>>  ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2 icedtea6-1.5
>>>>  3b93da7c778a0a5147db1eec28218a8df462161d icedtea6-1.5.1
>>>>  d70ae78f89c2cd9cb782f197804a5bcf99ca9949 icedtea6-1.5.2
>>>> +d0593233c9ce2110854a97a36eda57996ba34d0e icedtea6-1.5.3
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Huh? Has there been a 1.5.2 release? I didn't see an announcement.
>>>
>> Sorry, we were just building rpms for RHEL (including some important
>> patches), there is no official release. I realize this is out of order,
>> should I make a formal annoucement?
> 
> Are we now at the point on the 1.5 branch where a release would make
> sense?  If so, then it should be tagged as icedtea6-1.5.2, tarballed
> and announced.  The two current tags, icedtea6-1.5.2 and
> icedtea6-1.5.3, don't correspond to releases and should be removed.

I think this will be a useful release.  It's basically the stable 1.5
branch plus a couple of bug fixes.  I know that we at Red Hat want it
for a RHEL release, but all distros that are using 1.5 would benefit.
So, icedtea6-1.5.2 would IMO be appropriate.

Andrew.