/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5: Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset...

[Lillian Angel]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>   
>> 2009/9/2 Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com>:
>>     
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>       
>>>> 2009/9/1  <langel at icedtea.classpath.org>:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> changeset 503129230ba0 in /hg/release/icedtea6-1.5
>>>>> details:
>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5?cmd=changeset;node=503129230ba0
>>>>> author: langel
>>>>> date: Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>>
>>>>>       Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset d0593233c9ce
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diffstat:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>> .hgtags |    1 +
>>>>>
>>>>> diffs (8 lines):
>>>>>
>>>>> diff -r d0593233c9ce -r 503129230ba0 .hgtags
>>>>> --- a/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:08 2009 -0400
>>>>> +++ b/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2
>>>>>  ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2 icedtea6-1.5
>>>>>  3b93da7c778a0a5147db1eec28218a8df462161d icedtea6-1.5.1
>>>>>  d70ae78f89c2cd9cb782f197804a5bcf99ca9949 icedtea6-1.5.2
>>>>> +d0593233c9ce2110854a97a36eda57996ba34d0e icedtea6-1.5.3
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Huh? Has there been a 1.5.2 release? I didn't see an announcement.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Sorry, we were just building rpms for RHEL (including some important
>>> patches), there is no official release. I realize this is out of order,
>>> should I make a formal annoucement?
>>>       
>> Are we now at the point on the 1.5 branch where a release would make
>> sense?  If so, then it should be tagged as icedtea6-1.5.2, tarballed
>> and announced.  The two current tags, icedtea6-1.5.2 and
>> icedtea6-1.5.3, don't correspond to releases and should be removed.
>>     
>
> I think this will be a useful release.  It's basically the stable 1.5
> branch plus a couple of bug fixes.  I know that we at Red Hat want it
> for a RHEL release, but all distros that are using 1.5 would benefit.
> So, icedtea6-1.5.2 would IMO be appropriate.


Do you propose we move the 1.5.2 tag to replace the 1.5.3 tag and have 
an official release then?

Lillian