/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5: Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset...

[Andrew John Hughes]

2009/9/2 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>:
> Lillian Angel wrote:
>> Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>>> 2009/9/2 Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009/9/1  <langel at icedtea.classpath.org>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> changeset 503129230ba0 in /hg/release/icedtea6-1.5
>>>>>>> details:
>>>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5?cmd=changeset;node=503129230ba0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> author: langel
>>>>>>> date: Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset d0593233c9ce
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diffstat:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>>> .hgtags |    1 +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diffs (8 lines):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff -r d0593233c9ce -r 503129230ba0 .hgtags
>>>>>>> --- a/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:08 2009 -0400
>>>>>>> +++ b/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>>>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2
>>>>>>>  ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2 icedtea6-1.5
>>>>>>>  3b93da7c778a0a5147db1eec28218a8df462161d icedtea6-1.5.1
>>>>>>>  d70ae78f89c2cd9cb782f197804a5bcf99ca9949 icedtea6-1.5.2
>>>>>>> +d0593233c9ce2110854a97a36eda57996ba34d0e icedtea6-1.5.3
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Huh? Has there been a 1.5.2 release? I didn't see an announcement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, we were just building rpms for RHEL (including some important
>>>>> patches), there is no official release. I realize this is out of order,
>>>>> should I make a formal annoucement?
>>>>>
>>>> Are we now at the point on the 1.5 branch where a release would make
>>>> sense?  If so, then it should be tagged as icedtea6-1.5.2, tarballed
>>>> and announced.  The two current tags, icedtea6-1.5.2 and
>>>> icedtea6-1.5.3, don't correspond to releases and should be removed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think this will be a useful release.  It's basically the stable 1.5
>>> branch plus a couple of bug fixes.  I know that we at Red Hat want it
>>> for a RHEL release, but all distros that are using 1.5 would benefit.
>>> So, icedtea6-1.5.2 would IMO be appropriate.
>>
>>
>> Do you propose we move the 1.5.2 tag to replace the 1.5.3 tag and have
>> an official release then?
>
> That's what I'm suggesting, if no-one objects.  Assuming that it's passed
> all its tests, that is!
>
> Andrew.
>
>

I'd agree with that.
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8