/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5: Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset...

[Andrew Haley]

Lillian Angel wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>  
>>> 2009/9/2 Lillian Angel <langel at redhat.com>:
>>>    
>>>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> 2009/9/1  <langel at icedtea.classpath.org>:
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>> changeset 503129230ba0 in /hg/release/icedtea6-1.5
>>>>>> details:
>>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/release/icedtea6-1.5?cmd=changeset;node=503129230ba0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> author: langel
>>>>>> date: Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       Added tag icedtea6-1.5.3 for changeset d0593233c9ce
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diffstat:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>>> .hgtags |    1 +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diffs (8 lines):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff -r d0593233c9ce -r 503129230ba0 .hgtags
>>>>>> --- a/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:08 2009 -0400
>>>>>> +++ b/.hgtags   Tue Sep 01 12:37:18 2009 -0400
>>>>>> @@ -17,3 +17,4 @@ ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2
>>>>>>  ffe92bbe7e8466b323f0aedbdac4b6ecf44eafe2 icedtea6-1.5
>>>>>>  3b93da7c778a0a5147db1eec28218a8df462161d icedtea6-1.5.1
>>>>>>  d70ae78f89c2cd9cb782f197804a5bcf99ca9949 icedtea6-1.5.2
>>>>>> +d0593233c9ce2110854a97a36eda57996ba34d0e icedtea6-1.5.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>> Huh? Has there been a 1.5.2 release? I didn't see an announcement.
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> Sorry, we were just building rpms for RHEL (including some important
>>>> patches), there is no official release. I realize this is out of order,
>>>> should I make a formal annoucement?
>>>>       
>>> Are we now at the point on the 1.5 branch where a release would make
>>> sense?  If so, then it should be tagged as icedtea6-1.5.2, tarballed
>>> and announced.  The two current tags, icedtea6-1.5.2 and
>>> icedtea6-1.5.3, don't correspond to releases and should be removed.
>>>     
>>
>> I think this will be a useful release.  It's basically the stable 1.5
>> branch plus a couple of bug fixes.  I know that we at Red Hat want it
>> for a RHEL release, but all distros that are using 1.5 would benefit.
>> So, icedtea6-1.5.2 would IMO be appropriate.
> 
> 
> Do you propose we move the 1.5.2 tag to replace the 1.5.3 tag and have
> an official release then?

That's what I'm suggesting, if no-one objects.  Assuming that it's passed
all its tests, that is!

Andrew.