Bugids already used in this repository (Re: [FOR REVIEW] hs14 merge for OpenJDK6)

[Kelly O'Hair]

They look fine, so you can use me as a reviewer, if needed.

I always do a double check with Joe Darcy, just to make sure
I don't mess up any potential openjdk6 build promotion activities
and to  make sure the fix is wanted in openjdk6.

These changes are needed and wanted, in my opinion.

-kto


Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2009/9/12 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>   
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2009-September/000772.html
>>>
>>> Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/hotspot: 557 new changesets
>>>
>>> Woohoo!
>>>     
>>
>> So do we move to hs16 after the next build (17) is promoted? ;)
>>   
> 
> Now that OpenJDK6 is caught up to HSX-14, I have two critical
> bug fixes ready:
> 
> % hg out
> comparing with ssh://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot
> searching for changes
> changeset:   616:2b4230d1e589
> parent:      559:26bc4770e671
> user:        dcubed
> date:        Tue Jul 28 13:35:00 2009 -0600
> summary:     6862295: JDWP threadid changes during debugging session 
> (leading to ingored breakpoints)
> 
> changeset:   617:9601152ccfc1
> user:        dcubed
> date:        Fri Aug 28 12:25:46 2009 -0600
> summary:     6875393: 2/3 JNI itable index cache is broken
> 
> changeset:   618:16a50381378e
> tag:         tip
> parent:      615:ccb185a165a1
> parent:      617:9601152ccfc1
> user:        dcubed
> date:        Tue Sep 15 09:15:51 2009 -0600
> summary:     Merge
> 
> 
> The first changeset is in 6u16-B01/HSX-14.2-B01 and JDK7-B71/HSX-16-B08.
> The second changeset is in 6u18-B02/HSX-16-B09 and HSX-17-B02; the second
> changeset hasn't made it from RT_Baseline into Main_Baseline yet. :-(
> 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/2b4230d1e589
> 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx16/baseline/rev/9601152ccfc1
> 
> So how do I get approval for pushing these fixes to OpenJDK6?
> 
> Dan
> 
>