Bugids already used in this repository (Re: [FOR REVIEW] hs14 merge for OpenJDK6)
Daniel D. Daugherty
Daniel.Daugherty at Sun.COM
Tue Sep 15 09:13:47 PDT 2009
Thanks Kelly! The changes were already reviewed. I'll wait to
hear from Joe Darcy...
Dan
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> They look fine, so you can use me as a reviewer, if needed.
>
> I always do a double check with Joe Darcy, just to make sure
> I don't mess up any potential openjdk6 build promotion activities
> and to make sure the fix is wanted in openjdk6.
>
> These changes are needed and wanted, in my opinion.
>
> -kto
>
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> 2009/9/12 Andrew John Hughes <gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org>:
>>>
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk6-dev/2009-September/000772.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Subject: hg: jdk6/jdk6/hotspot: 557 new changesets
>>>>
>>>> Woohoo!
>>>>
>>>
>>> So do we move to hs16 after the next build (17) is promoted? ;)
>>>
>>
>> Now that OpenJDK6 is caught up to HSX-14, I have two critical
>> bug fixes ready:
>>
>> % hg out
>> comparing with ssh://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk6/jdk6/hotspot
>> searching for changes
>> changeset: 616:2b4230d1e589
>> parent: 559:26bc4770e671
>> user: dcubed
>> date: Tue Jul 28 13:35:00 2009 -0600
>> summary: 6862295: JDWP threadid changes during debugging session
>> (leading to ingored breakpoints)
>>
>> changeset: 617:9601152ccfc1
>> user: dcubed
>> date: Fri Aug 28 12:25:46 2009 -0600
>> summary: 6875393: 2/3 JNI itable index cache is broken
>>
>> changeset: 618:16a50381378e
>> tag: tip
>> parent: 615:ccb185a165a1
>> parent: 617:9601152ccfc1
>> user: dcubed
>> date: Tue Sep 15 09:15:51 2009 -0600
>> summary: Merge
>>
>>
>> The first changeset is in 6u16-B01/HSX-14.2-B01 and JDK7-B71/HSX-16-B08.
>> The second changeset is in 6u18-B02/HSX-16-B09 and HSX-17-B02; the
>> second
>> changeset hasn't made it from RT_Baseline into Main_Baseline yet. :-(
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/2b4230d1e589
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hsx16/baseline/rev/9601152ccfc1
>>
>> So how do I get approval for pushing these fixes to OpenJDK6?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list