Request to push: Port libjpeg fix from icedtea6 to icedtea

[jon.vanalten at redhat.com]

Diff of *correct* fix, attached.

jon


----- "Jon VanAlten" <jon.vanalten at redhat.com> wrote:

> Urp, thanks and you're right... I based this on browsing repo via
> http, didn't realize I was in an older revision...  Better port to
> follow.
> 
> 
> ----- "Matthias Klose" <doko at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 29.04.2010 20:59, jon.vanalten at redhat.com wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The attached diff ports the fix for
> > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=367 to
> icedtea,
> > as suggested in
> > http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=442
> > >
> > > OK to push?
> > 
> > didn't we revert this patch? IMO it's only safe to use the jpeg
> > version that 
> > openjdk was built with.
> > 
> >    Matthias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: port442.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 7886 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20100429/7fc82bec/port442.diff