Changes in Makefile.am for IcedTea6-1.7.1 (PulseAudio issue)

Pavel Tisnovsky ptisnovs at redhat.com
Tue Mar 9 06:48:23 PST 2010


Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 9 March 2010 12:59, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>> On 14:38 Tue 09 Mar     , Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>>> there is one new PulseAudio issue in IcedTea6-1.7.1 - library for
>>>> wrong platform (ppc32) is used when IcedTea is built for ppc64
>>>> platform.
>>>>
>>>> This issue can be easily fixed by small change in Makefile.am. I
>>>> created patch for IcedTea6-1.7.1 (it is based on patch which Gary
>>>> sent me yesterday - thanks very much btw :-) and successfully
>>>> tested "patched" IcedTea6-1.7.1 on F10 i386 and F10 ppc. Is it
>>>> possible to push this change to IcedTea6-1.7 repository (I suppose
>>>> IcedTea6.1-7 and IcedTea6-1.7.1 has the same repo, am I right)?
>>> I'm a bit concerned about using something specific to Zero; is it
>>> possible that this could be an issue on some multilib setups for
>>> x86_64?  This fix looks ok for the 1.7 branch, but I'd rather we
>>> generalised ARCHFLAG in the main tree so it is always set.
>> If anything it should fix some multilib setups for x86_64, since
>> they'll fail with the same error.
>>
>> ZERO_ARCHFLAG is just -m{31,32,64}.  It could easily be renamed
>> as ARCHFLAG in the IcedTea makefiles...
>>
> 
> Exactly what I was thinking.

So is it correct to rename ZERO_ARCHFLAG to ARCHFLAG, add this flag as 
compiler options to build these six PulseAudio-related sources and push 
Makefile.am to IcedTea6-1.7 repository?

> 
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> http://gbenson.net/
>>
> 
> 
> 




More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list