Fwd: Re: removing junit as part of switching back to testng

[Jiri Vanek]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: removing junit as part of switching back to testng
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:04:21 +0200
From: Jiri Vanek <jvanek at redhat.com>
To: Dr Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com>

On 04/11/2011 06:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 17:47 Mon 11 Apr     , Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> diff -r 934543b8084d ChangeLog
>> --- a/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 16:03:44 2011 +0100
>> +++ b/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 17:45:44 2011 +0200
>> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
>> +2011-04-11  Jiri Vanek<jvanek at redhat.com>
>> +
>> +	* removed junit (1/2 from mooving to testNG)
>> +
>>    2011-04-08  Omair Majid<omajid at redhat.com>
>>
>>    	* README: Update to add notes on rhino and junit.
>
> Why would we want to remove a perfectly working solution?
>
> We've already discusssed this at length.  Please read the previous discussion.

No you weren't  discusing this "perfect" solution. You have just made
choice. Me and Omair have discused TestNG. You swapped to junit.
WHY????? We lost much more then we have got.Omair's testng patch was
also 'perfectly working solution'.