removing junit as part of switching back to testng

[Jiri Vanek]

On 04/11/2011 06:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 17:47 Mon 11 Apr     , Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> diff -r 934543b8084d ChangeLog
>> --- a/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 16:03:44 2011 +0100
>> +++ b/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 17:45:44 2011 +0200
>> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
>> +2011-04-11  Jiri Vanek<jvanek at redhat.com>
>> +
>> +	* removed junit (1/2 from mooving to testNG)
>> +
>>    2011-04-08  Omair Majid<omajid at redhat.com>
>>
>>    	* README: Update to add notes on rhino and junit.
>
> Why would we want to remove a perfectly working solution?
>
> We've already discusssed this at length.  Please read the previous discussion.
  So I can consider that as approved?