removing junit as part of switching back to testng

[Dr Andrew John Hughes]

On 08:56 Tue 12 Apr     , Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 06:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 17:47 Mon 11 Apr     , Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >> diff -r 934543b8084d ChangeLog
> >> --- a/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 16:03:44 2011 +0100
> >> +++ b/ChangeLog	Mon Apr 11 17:45:44 2011 +0200
> >> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> >> +2011-04-11  Jiri Vanek<jvanek at redhat.com>
> >> +
> >> +	* removed junit (1/2 from mooving to testNG)
> >> +
> >>    2011-04-08  Omair Majid<omajid at redhat.com>
> >>
> >>    	* README: Update to add notes on rhino and junit.
> >
> > Why would we want to remove a perfectly working solution?
> >
> > We've already discusssed this at length.  Please read the previous discussion.
>   So I can consider that as approved?

Consider what approved?  This patch? No.
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://icedtea.classpath.org
PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D  0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37