IcedTea7 HEAD build error on RHEL 5 x86_64

Deepak Bhole dbhole at redhat.com
Thu Sep 22 19:21:26 PDT 2011


* Dr Andrew John Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> [2011-09-22 22:09]:
> On 11:49 Thu 22 Sep     , Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> [2011-09-22 09:53]:
> > > Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > > > * Pavel Tisnovsky <ptisnovs at redhat.com> [2011-09-22 08:37]:
> > > >> Greetings,
> > > >>
> > > >> there's a new IcedTea7 build error thrown when IcedTea7 HEAD is build on RHEL 5 x86_64.
> > > >>
> > > >> Config log & shell script used to build IcedTea7 is stored in an attachment.
> > > >>
> > > > 
> > > > Is libattr-devel installed on the system?
> > > 
> > > Nope (and ./configure did not complaint ;-). I've installed it and trying to build IcedTea7 again.
> > > 
> > > Maybe it's the right moment to update the wiki page http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/BuildRequirements
> > > 
> > > Do you think it's a good idea to split this page to IcedTea6 part and IcedTea7(8) part?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi Pavel,
> > 
> > Are the requirements radically different? From what I've seen, they are
> > very similar if not the same for v6 and 7. If we can maintain the same
> > page for both, I am all the more for it since it reduces changes of
> > pages getting out of sync.
> > 
> 
> You're wrong.  NIO introduces a number of new dependencies including
> GIO and calls to extended attribute functions.
> 

Yeah I realized that after the conversation on IRC this morning. I was
going by the # of deps I had to add to the 1.7 spec file for Fedora
(none) vs 1.6. But clearly that was not adequate.

Deepak




More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list