[rfc][icedtea-web] rewritten xfork test

[Pavel Tisnovsky]

Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 05:24 PM, Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>> Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> Inspired by Omair's effort to reduce failing tests, I have rewritten
>>> deadlock tests, which were failing quite randomly in half of the cases.
>>> It was caused by delayed removing of zombies after process have
>>> time-outed.
>>>
>>> By this patch, ignorelist which I have proposed two days ago (and will
>>> do again soon as separate patch) to ignore no-testable classes (eg
>>> interfaces), and fixes from [RFC][icedtea-web] fixes to reproducer
>>> engine, we will be on three  failing reproducers ("spaces" ) and  with
>>> occasional cache test fill.
>>>
>>> All those five -  two sometimes, three regularly - failing reproducers
>>> are the same issue we are talking  in [icedtea-web] RFC: disable tests
>>> that are known to fail thread. - they are representing issue., but...:)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012-03-22  Jiri Vanek<jvanek at redhat.com>
>>>
>>>      Rewritten DeadLockTestTest to stop failing in more then 1/2 of
>>> cases
>>>      All assassinated processes were hanging as zombies, killed
>>> forcibly by
>>>      kill -9 now.
>>>      *
>>> /tests/jnlp_tests/simple/deadlocktest/testcases/DeadLockTestTest.java:
>>>      (countJavaInstances) now return pids of found javas.
>>>      (killDiff) new method killing zombie javas forcibly.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jiri,
>>
>> could you please fix following typos in the test tool?
>>
>> "This process is hanging more th_e_n"
>>
>> "...but isnt!"
>>            ^    (on more places)
>>
>> "proces inside background deadlock cant be null. Was."
>>                                       ^           It ^
>>
>> "lunched JVMs must be exactly 2"
>>    ^  (this one is funny :-)
>>
> 
> Yap. fixed. The changes which were not part of this changeset but were
> noticed will follow as additional changeset.
> 
> Ok now?
> 
> Thanx foe check.
>  J.
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Pavel
> 


Hi Jiri,

your latest changes look ok.

Thank you,
Pavel