porting icedtea6 to FreeBSD

[Jason Helfman]

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Hughes <ahughes at redhat.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:59:00AM -0400, Andrew Hughes thus spake:
> > >> Any thoughts on any of this?
> > >> Thanks, again.
> > >>
> > >> -jgh
> > >
> > >What are you doing here?
> > >
> > >/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|--dry-run||g'
> >
> >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.am
> >
> >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.in
> > >/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|--check|-q|g'
> >
> >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.am
> >
> >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.in
> > >
> > >If you're removing --dry-run, you're going to be applying the patch
> > >twice, which is why it's failing.
> > >--
> > >Andrew :)
> >
> > I've modified this to test the patch which in FreeBSD is the "-C"
> > switch,
> > and the "-q" is for SHASUM's to only output the hash.
> >
> > I was able to get much further in the build! Any thoughts on why this
> > patch
> > was seen as already applied?
> >
>
> Because the build tests the patch, then applies it if that passes.  If you
> removed --dry-run from the first invocation and didn't replace it with -C,
> you'd be applying the patch twice instead.
>
>
That is what I have done, though. --dry-run is being replaced with -C in
the build.
Is something else showing up?

-jgh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20120417/a27f55a3/attachment.html