porting icedtea6 to FreeBSD

[Andrew Hughes]

----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Hughes < ahughes at redhat.com >
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:59:00AM -0400, Andrew Hughes thus spake:
> > >> Any thoughts on any of this?
> > >> Thanks, again.
> > >> 
> > >> -jgh
> > > 
> > >What are you doing here?
> > > 
> > >/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|--dry-run||g'
> > >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.am
> > >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.in
> > >/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|--check|-q|g'
> > >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.am
> > >/usr/local/workspace/redports/java/icedtea6/work/icedtea6-1.11.1/Makefile.in
> > > 
> > >If you're removing --dry-run, you're going to be applying the
> > >patch
> > >twice, which is why it's failing.
> > >--
> > >Andrew :)
> > 
> > I've modified this to test the patch which in FreeBSD is the "-C"
> > switch,
> > and the "-q" is for SHASUM's to only output the hash.
> > 
> > I was able to get much further in the build! Any thoughts on why
> > this
> > patch
> > was seen as already applied?
> > 
> 
> Because the build tests the patch, then applies it if that passes. If
> you
> removed --dry-run from the first invocation and didn't replace it
> with -C,
> you'd be applying the patch twice instead.
> 
> 
> 
> That is what I have done, though. --dry-run is being replaced with -C
> in the build.
> Is something else showing up?
> 
> -jgh
> 
> 

And it's still failing in the same way?  I thought you said you'd got much further... :-S
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07