Reviewer needed: fixed typos in JDK7 forest (ScriptEngineManager class)

[Pavel Tisnovsky]

Andrew Hughes wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to fix JavaDoc typos in a class ScriptEngineManager.
>>>>> Patch
>>>>> applicable
>>>>> to jdk7 forest is stored in an attachment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anybody please review this change?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Pavel
>>>>>
>>>>> (fix for upstream will follow).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Text Documents:hg_diff.patch]
>>>>>
>>>> Such a change to public javax.* classes needs to go upstream
>>>> first.
>>>>  Although
>>>> the changes are minor, this alters the API specification.
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
>>>> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I see this was reviewed and pushed to 8:
>>>
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-February/009380.html
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-March/009422.html
>>>
>>> Let's see if it makes it to 7u.  If it does, we can add it to
>>> IcedTea7 too, ahead of u6.
>> FYI: now this change is in 7u(6) too.
>>
>> Pavel
>>
> 
> What was the reason for not posting to u4?  This doesn't seem to be have been discussed publicly.
> If it has, please point me to a link.

I received personal mail from Edvard Wendeling saying "JDK 7u4 is now ramping down and the inflow of bug fixes is more
restricted...."

Given this patch just changes JavaDoc and does not fix any real bug, I personally don't feel
the need to hurry and push it to u4.