[icedtea-web] RFC: PR898: signed applications with big jnlp-file doesn't start
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Thu Mar 22 06:11:55 PDT 2012
On 03/22/2012 01:58 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> On 03/22/2012 10:38 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> Just two more minor nitpicks
>>
>> Can you add bug number/link to reproducer comment and to changelog?
>>
>
> Done for ChangeLog/NEWS. I would rather not add bug numbers to the
> codebase/test case though - I feel that the testcase stands on its own
> and adding bug numbers doesnt really add new value. It is stored in the
> mercurial history and changelog for those who do want to look it up.
Then you will be enemy of #bug annotation? :)
>
>>> If you are ok now with default utf-8 encoding, I'm for, and if you
>>> will consider the encoding
>>> reading and then re-encode if necessary, then it can be as separate
>>> patch.
>>>
>
> I would rather not mess with encoding in this patch. It's not a
> regression, right? If it does cause problems later, I (or someone else)
> will, of course, fix it.
hmm.. But you are adding byte <-> string transformations unless I'm very wrong. Aren't you?
Maybe to set plain ASCII can be solution?
>
> The only change between this patch and the one I posted before is the
> NEWS/ChangeLog update.
>
> Okay for HEAD? 1.2?
>
> Thanks,
> Omair
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list