[icedtea-web][rfc] Fix of backup of deployment.properties on some OSs

Jiri Vanek jvanek at redhat.com
Fri May 17 06:16:25 PDT 2013


On 05/17/2013 02:58 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 01:58 PM, Jacob Wisor wrote:
>> "Jiri Vanek"<jvanek at xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Btw will you update the manifest patch? Imho worthy O:)
>>>
>>
>> I have looked into that further, but I must admit that I am confused by the whole autoconf and automake infrastructure. Way too complicated to just solve a relatively simple problem... It might have been okay 20 years ago to use that sceme, but fortunetelly there are better tools now, ;)
>>
>> Jacob
>>
> 
> diff --git a/netx.manifest.in b/netx.manifest.in
> --- a/netx.manifest.in
> +++ b/netx.manifest.in
> @@ -1,2 +1,8 @@
>   Implementation-Title: @PACKAGE_NAME@
>   Implementation-Version: @FULL_VERSION@
> +Implementation-URL: http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web
> +Implementation-Vendor: IcedTea
> +Specification-Title: JSR56: Java Network Launching Protocol and API
> +Specification-URL: http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/mrel/jsr056
> +Specification-Vendor: Java Community Process
> +Specification-Version: 6.0
> 
> 
> I'm for this slightly updated (just vendor changed) manifest to go in. No more variables are needed
> at this time.
> 
> Of course we can define all VENDOR, PACKAGE_URL as variables in makefile and lets the autotools
> machinery to substitute,  but is it really worthy?
> 

damn - PACKAGE_URL works for me. Sorry.

so:

+Implementation-URL: @PACKAGE_URL@

> I do not want to let this patch die.
> 
> J.
> 




More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list