[rfc][icedtea-web] change Launcher constructor calling

[Jiri Vanek]

On 06/18/2015 04:51 PM, Andrew Azores wrote:
> On 18/06/15 06:46 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>> On 06/17/2015 11:45 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2015 05:32 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>>>> Unluckily the test needed a lot of work, because now the message is always posted to queue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise the patch is pretty straightworward.
>>>>
>>>> Aslo I have encountered some issues with reprodcuers:
>>>>
>>>> FAILED: testCaching(AbsolutePathsAndQueryStrings) expected:<...ipHttpPathParams.jar[]> but
>>>> was:<...ipHttpPathParams.jar[.i_abcd]>
>>>>
>>>>     - query patch is guilty
>>>>
>>>> Those three are very suspicious.
>>>> FAILED: ReplaceSecurityManagerLunch1(ReplaceSecurityManagerTest) ReplaceSecurityManagerLunch1
>>>> should
>>>> not be terminated, but was
>> this one is also - passing again (uuff)
>>
>>>> FAILED: ApplicationJNLPLocalTest(CodeBaseManifestEntrySignedNotMatching) should contain `*** APPLET
>>>> FINISHED ***`
>>>> FAILED: AppletJNLPRLocalTest(CodeBaseManifestEntrySignedNotMatching) should contain `*** APPLET
>>>> FINISHED ***`
>>>>
>>>> those three seems to be ths patch related....hmmm
>>>> FAILED: testJavawsJNLP - opera(PackGZipTest) stdout should contain init, but it didnt.
>>>> FAILED: testJavawsJNLP - midori(PackGZipTest) stdout should contain init, but it didnt.
>>>> FAILED: testJavawsJNLP - epiphany(PackGZipTest) stdout should contain init, but it didnt.
>> those three are passing again. good:)
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I needed to temrinate testun so I have not run them all. But seem sthat soemthing already went
>>>> wrong
>>>> in alst few pushes. (will run them today overnight)
>>
>> +
>> testTrustNoneJnlpAppletLaunch
>> testTrustNoneJnlpApplicationLaunch
>>
>> were brookne by this commit.
>>
>> some in  AbsolutePathsAndQueryStrings were broken some time ago.
>>
>>
>> and whole CodeBaseManifestEntrySignedNotMatching is now broken.
>>
>> All should be fixed asap. I willlok to them once I finally review PolicyEditor. As other things I
>> have started are not so intensive-to-be-kept-in-mind.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There is the patch for your EOF.As I told,posted separtely, as I 'm not able to see what
>> everything it may affect.
>> J.
>
> Looks alright. Failing tests are worrying as always but I trust you to get them fixed :)
>
hehe :) Fair enugh. I wil pushit tomorow, because daily tester is now still running 1.6 (and will 
pick up head later..adn I would like to have the testruns of headless dialogues and this one separate..)

Thanx for eyballing (/me again on policy parser)


J.