prerelase of icedtea-web 1.8
Jiri Vanek
jvanek at redhat.com
Thu Mar 7 13:55:24 UTC 2019
Thanx!
Why the:
+ jre_dir.push("");
?
I cant see wher eit iterates over 11, 1.8 and so on, but I trust it does :)
Except the empty push, Althouh it is hard to read itm I'm ok with the patch, and will push it for
you (once the mepty push is justified/removed)
On 3/7/19 2:37 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
> forgot patch
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Lars Herschke
>
> Data-Service GmbH
> Beethovenstraße 2a
> 23617 Stockelsdorf
> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>
>
> Lars Herschke schrieb:
>> So, here is the new patch.
>>
>> This patch tries to get JavaHome out of the registry with the following
>> priosrization.
>>
>> - JRE 1.8
>> - JDK 1.8
>> - max JDK >= 9
>> - JDK 1.8
>> - max JDK >= 9
>> - max JRE >= 9 (only 9 or 10 possible)
>> - max JDK < 1.8
>> - max JRE < 1.8
>>
>> The highest minor version within the major version is always preferred.
>>
>> In addition, the method find_jre checks with this patch whether it makes
>> sense to append the jre directory.
>>
>>
>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>
>> Lars Herschke
>>
>> Data-Service GmbH
>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>
>>
>> Lars Herschke schrieb:
>>> Hi Jiri.
>>>
>>>>> - in addition I was unable to verify against jdk8. The ojdkbuild of jdk8 never put anything into
>>>>> "my" registry.
>>>
>>> This can be selected and deselected in the installer. That's why I'm
>>> testing JAVA_HOME and PATH so hard.
>>>
>>> I am currently testing a new version of my patch. I hope to be able to
>>> make it available today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>
>>> Lars Herschke
>>>
>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>
>>>
>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>> Hi Again.
>>>>
>>>> Attached is the workig version of my patch from yesterday.
>>>>
>>>> I realised that my approach requires: java_registry_path("SOFTWARE\\JavaSoft\\JDK\\11.0.2")
>>>> - note the security number. This it is no go.
>>>> - in addition I was unable to verify against jdk8. The ojdkbuild of jdk8 never put anything into
>>>> "my" registry.
>>>>
>>>> From what I seen, your patch is ok with jdk11,12 and onwards untill the registry changes again, right?
>>>>
>>>> J.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/6/19 6:47 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>> What are the regQuery and RegEnumKeyExW for?
>>>>>
>>>>> RegQueryInfoKeyW gives me the number of subkeys, so I can get directly
>>>>> the last subkey with RegEnumKeyExW.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I do tt see versions in the query.. What is the pooled order? SHould be
>>>>>> jre8->jdk8->jdk11->jdkAnythingElse
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to get Java in the following order.
>>>>>
>>>>> - latest pre JMPS-JRE
>>>>> - latest pre JMPS-JDK
>>>>> - latest JMPS-JDK
>>>>> - latest JMPS-JRE
>>>>>
>>>>> I always try to get the latest Java, favoring the pre JPMS Java.
>>>>> However, so I may prefer a Java 7 to a Java 11.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you mind to comapre with mine patch? (and honestly say that it is garbage and yours is more
>>>>>>> bulletproof - I do not expect more)
>>>>>
>>>>> I dont't understand on your patch, how jdkX_registry_path,
>>>>> jreX_registry_path and jdk11plus_registry_path should work. There is no
>>>>> JavaHome-key on these levels.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I disagree with Your change to JAVA_HOME and PATH - because it can already be jre. On contrary, if
>>>>>>> it si jdk, then it is already valid. HAve that part bitten you somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> You are right, but on Windows, JAVA_HOME is only set by ojdkbuild and
>>>>> this set JAVA_HOME to his jdk root-directory. Oracle-Java don't set
>>>>> JAVA_HOME, but writes registry keys ever.
>>>>> The PATH is set from ojdkbuild to [jdk-root]\bin, so my changes also
>>>>> works. The PATH from Oracle-Java is complete outside the java directory
>>>>> (C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Oracle\Java\javapath). In this path
>>>>> you will not find any library.
>>>>> Everything said so far, only applies to Java 8. As of Java 9, there is
>>>>> no more jre directory around jdk.
>>>>> In the end, you can not know if PATH or JAVA_HOME is a jdk or a jre,
>>>>> without checking it.
>>>>> It did not bother me, I just tried to be more compatible with the
>>>>> standard installations under windows
>>>>> Last but not least, the method is called find_jre.:-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>
>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>
>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>> On 3/6/19 5:16 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> attached a new separate windows registry patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wou. Interesting approach. As you had not replied if you will elaborate on it, I had in meantime
>>>>>> did simialr patch (attached, not tested, literally just finished writing right now, and started to
>>>>>> warm up windows VM) - absed on yours, jsut with the pooling of registry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My patch looks a bit more rustlike - especailly it uses chain of match instead of loop, and TBH I
>>>>>> do not understand half of yours :)
>>>>>> What are the regQuery and RegEnumKeyExW for?
>>>>>> I do tt see versions in the query.. What is the pooled order? SHould be
>>>>>> jre8->jdk8->jdk11->jdkAnythingElse
>>>>>> Do you mind to comapre with mine patch? (and honestly say that it is garbage and yours is more
>>>>>> bulletproof - I do not expect more)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I disagree with Your change to JAVA_HOME and PATH - because it can already be jre. On contrary, if
>>>>>> it si jdk, then it is already valid. HAve that part bitten you somewhere?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Really thanx!
>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 2:29 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Then I would suggest the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>> - Does it have sense to check both jre and jsk keys? jre first, and jdk as fallback? If not, then
>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy with ou jre from registy patch. Do you mind to post it as separate patch? In both cases
>>>>>>>>>> (jre->jdk fallback, jre search only) I will push for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you plan to check more than one regkey than you should check in the
>>>>>>>>> following order.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Runtime Environment
>>>>>>>>> 2. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Java Development Kit
>>>>>>>>> 3. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JDK
>>>>>>>>> 4. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JRE
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. for the last pre-JPMS-jre (max Java 9)
>>>>>>>>> 2. for the last pre-JPMS-jdk (max Java 8)
>>>>>>>>> 3. for the last JPMS-jdk ( Java 11+)
>>>>>>>>> 4. for the last JPMS-jre (max Java 10)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Starting with Java 11 you have to check the jdk first, because there is
>>>>>>>>> nor jre anymore.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you willing to code that? I would promiss you a beer on fosdem :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 1:54 PM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jiri.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering why the acinclude hunk is necessary - Do you intend to ship..or whatever custom
>>>>>>>>>>>>> itw-binaries built on windows? The build is the only thing I do seriously on windows, and thus I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering why I had never needed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed my jdk direct in windows and not inside cygwin. So my
>>>>>>>>>>> path inside cygwin is /cygdrive/c/Program\
>>>>>>>>>>> Files/ojdkbuild/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.201-1. This path isn't found by
>>>>>>>>>>> configure without jdk-home-configure-switch.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have it installed to in windows, but something must go differently. Will push this hunk for you asap
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The unittest++ targets are for plugin only,. You should not even hit them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Without my changes i get the following error when i make "make clean".
>>>>>>>>>>> "make: *** No rule to make target 'clean-unittest++', needed by
>>>>>>>>>>> 'clean-tests'. Stop."
>>>>>>>>>>> clean-unittest++ is commented out in the generated Makefile because i
>>>>>>>>>>> build without native plugin.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hm interesting, I'm running cleanow and iot works. Anyway will test you changeset, and if ti do not
>>>>>>>>>> break anything (which I dubt) will push it for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunce is an problem - ITW, being distribution friendly, can not rely on random cargo pulled from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> web. Sorry. If it is really doing such a troubles, then I'm afraid it must go in in way, it can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ifouted on linxu. Do you mind to elaborate on this?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you have an jdk on windows without registry entries and set without
>>>>>>>>>>> JAVA_HOME, than jdk from path is trying. This path is canonicalized and
>>>>>>>>>>> leads to an unc-path. I have in a test spawn() persuaded (with
>>>>>>>>>>> current_dir) to use this unc-path, but java.exe don't like unc-path in
>>>>>>>>>>> his classpath.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Last hint - if I install JDK on windows. Will it still be found in registry in way you changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> search?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When you install openjdk with ojdkbuild it will be found. When you
>>>>>>>>>>> install oracle-jdk and you don't disable "Public JRE" in the installer,
>>>>>>>>>>> than it would also be found.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ok. Then I would suggest the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>> - Does it have sense to check both jre and jsk keys? jre first, and jdk as fallback? If not, then
>>>>>>>>>> I'm happy with ou jre from registy patch. Do you mind to post it as separate patch? In both cases
>>>>>>>>>> (jre->jdk fallback, jre search only) I will push for you asap.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Please provide dunce changeset as separate changeset. We have to discuss, how to make it
>>>>>>>>>> disable-able.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please reconsider fx patch. I dont think it is necessary. If it is, I would liek to know your case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanx!
>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Lars!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for eyballing the windows state.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering why the acinclude hunk is necessary - Do you intend to ship..or whatever custom
>>>>>>>>>>>> itw-binaries built on windows? The build is the only thing I do seriously on windows, and thus I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering why I had never needed it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The unittest++ targets are for plugin only,. You should not even hit them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dunce is an problem - ITW, being distribution friendly, can not rely on random cargo pulled from
>>>>>>>>>>>> web. Sorry. If it is really doing such a troubles, then I'm afraid it must go in in way, it can be
>>>>>>>>>>>> ifouted on linxu. Do you mind to elaborate on this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Last hint - if I install JDK on windows. Will it still be found in registry in way you changed the
>>>>>>>>>>>> search?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> hmm. The jfxrt is shameful bug, as the path is crippled also in shell and bat launchers an I keep
>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering how it could hapened it was not hit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> again, thanx a lot for this set of fixes!
>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/19 11:32 AM, Lars Herschke wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached a patch that cause the following changes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> acinclude.m4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - configure-switch --with-jdk-home acts on windows
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Makefile.am:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - windows-fix for changeset 1565:7010aa9d9309
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - fixes for make clean with native plugin disabled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rust-launcher:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Use cannonicalize from crate dunce, because std::fs:canonicalize
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return on windows unc-paths like this \\?\C:\foo. This paths doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work with spawn() from std::process::Command.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Correct path for jfxrt.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Use JRE-path instead of JDK-path from registry and don't panic if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this regkey doesn't exist, because jfxrt.jar, rt.jar and nashorn.jar
>>>>>>>>>>>>> are only in the JRE-directory on openjdk. In addition users, that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have only installed JRE don't have the JDK-regkey in your registry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lars Herschke
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Data-Service GmbH
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beethovenstraße 2a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23617 Stockelsdorf
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amtsgericht Lübeck, HRB 318 BS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geschäftsführung: Wilfried Paepcke, Dr. Andreas Longwitz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dr. Uwe Szyszka, Dr. Hans-Martin Rasch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tel. (0451) 49 00-188
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax. (0451) 49 00-123
>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-mail: lhersch at dssgmbh.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiri Vanek schrieb:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TYVM. Pushed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prerelase binraries will be updated on demand.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/25/19 10:39 AM, Olesya Gerasimenko wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please find attached the updated Russian translation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 22.02.2019 14:15, Jiri Vanek пишет:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please see the pre-release of icedtea-web 1.8: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can push it through your cases, it would be awesome. There are native portable builds for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both win and Linuxes. There is also multiplatform portable build based on shell/bat launchers only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had also updated (not released!) fedora builds to this pre - see "fedora" text file:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> While this prerelase is in testing, I would like to call alive translators - Russian and Czech - to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update theirs translations in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea-web/file/tip/netx/net/sourceforge/jnlp/resources/. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addition, I will start backporting of non-native patches to 1.7 so 1.7.2 can follow 1.8 very soon.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8 will be released once translations are in place. Of course anything wrong reported with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pre-released tarballs will be fixed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows testing:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.portable.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.win.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * itw-installer.msi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + icedtea-web-1.8pre.tar.gz (sources for custom builds - optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/icedtea-web-docs/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux testng:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * iccedtea-web-1.8pre.linux.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.portable.bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * icedtea-web-1.8pre.tar.gz (sources for distributions and custom builds - mandatory)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * fedora
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/itw1.8/icedtea-web-docs/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note for JRE search:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * windows shell scripts reads java_home or or registry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * linux shell scripts reads java_home or defualt system jdk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * native launchers reads in addition system paths
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TBH, I doubt I covered all combinations when I run my suites
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cases (if you have lack of them, but many of them may be already dead):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web-Tests#javaws
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web-Tests#IcedTea-Web_webstart_.28javaws.29_test_applications
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Known bugs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3705 --- Webstarted application tries to load resources from server incorrectly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3704 --- IcedTeaWeb doesn't run SAP PI web start interface - LAZY_CLASSLOADING_FAILED
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3697 --- Custom JRE/JDK within UTF-8 folder name ( key deployment.jre.dir in in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment.properties ) are not properly handled
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3689 --- DownloadService2 not implemented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3672 --- Classloader doesn't load jar correctly from JNLP extension
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3461 --- (still) Cannot run HP ILO4 remote console application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows desktop shortcuts are suspected to not work with jdk11 and up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Linux side, except native launchers and few bug fixes, not much changed. But for windows support
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is giant leap to be finally proper replacement for oracle javaws.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For 1.9 the plan is to remove plugin completely, and to move to github and under the wings of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AdoptOpenJDK....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking forward for both positive and negative feedbacks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
--
Jiri Vanek
Senior QE engineer, OpenJDK QE lead, Mgr.
Red Hat Czech
jvanek at redhat.com M: +420775390109
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list