graal and jdk8

[Gilles Duboscq]

Yes, they should be available i can see them in
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/graal/graal

What revision are you currently at? (hg summary)
Are you sure you pulled from the OpenJDK repository? (hg pull
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/graal/graal)


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Venkatachalam, Vasanth <
Vasanth.Venkatachalam at amd.com> wrote:

> Hi, have the changes for that fix been checked in?
>
> When I do an "hg update" under the root graal directory, I'm getting a "0
> files modified" message.
>
> Vasanth
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: graal-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net [mailto:
> graal-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Gilles Duboscq
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: Thomas Wuerthinger
> Cc: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: graal and jdk8
>
> The changes are currently propagating to
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/graal/graal
> Note that to run with a JDK8 you will probably need to add
> -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic For example "mx vm
> -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+EnableInvokeDynamic -version". This
> applies to both graal and server vm.
>
> - Gilles
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Thomas Wuerthinger <
> thomas.wuerthinger at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, thanks for pointing that out - we will push that temporary fix asap!
> > - thomas
> >
> >
> > On Feb 13, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> >
> > > On 02/13/2013 08:04 PM, Venkatachalam, Vasanth wrote:
> > >> Are there any workarounds for this while the issue is being addressed?
> > >
> > > a quick and dirty patch is to add a method isDefault that always
> > > return
> > false in  CodeExecutableElement.java
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Vasanth
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > Rémi
> > >
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Thomas Wuerthinger [mailto:thomas.wuerthinger at oracle.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:35 AM
> > >> To: Venkatachalam, Vasanth
> > >> Cc: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > >> Subject: Re: graal and jdk8
> > >>
> > >> OK thanks, we will investigate this. It has to do with the
> > annotation-based source code generation we use for parts of Truffle.
> > We are currently thinking of splitting this part of Graal into a
> > separate repository, because for many purposes of Graal (including the
> > ones of Project Sumatra) Truffle is not necessary.
> > >>
> > >> - thomas
> > >>
> > >> On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:27 AM, "Venkatachalam, Vasanth" <
> > Vasanth.Venkatachalam at amd.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Thomas,
> > >>>
> > >>> When I try  to build with jdk-8, I get the following error:
> > >>>
> > >>> Compiling Java sources for com.oracle.truffle.codegen.processor
> > >>> with
> > javac...
> > >>> warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction
> > >>> with -source 1.7
> > >>> /home/tester/vasanth/graal/graal/graal/com.oracle.truffle.codegen.
> > >>> proc
> > >>>
> >
> essor/src/com/oracle/truffle/codegen/processor/ast/CodeExecutableElement.java:34:
> > error: CodeExecutableElement is not abstract and does not override
> > abstract method isDefault() in ExecutableElement public class
> > CodeExecutableElement extends CodeElement<Element> implements
> > WritableExecutableElement {
> > >>>       ^
> > >>> 1 error
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's the java version I am using:
> > >>>
> > >>> tester at see-anna1:~/Downloads$ jdk1.8.0/bin/java -version java
> > >>> version "1.8.0-ea"
> > >>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0-ea-b74) Java
> > >>> HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.0-b15, mixed mode)
> > >>> tester at see-anna1:~/Downloads$
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Thomas Wuerthinger [mailto:thomas.wuerthinger at oracle.com]
> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:13 AM
> > >>> To: Venkatachalam, Vasanth
> > >>> Cc: graal-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > >>> Subject: Re: graal and jdk8
> > >>>
> > >>> Vasanth,
> > >>>
> > >>> We are not aware of any architectural problems that might prevent
> > Graal from running on a JDK8 host VM. Could you please give more
> > details on your setup and error message? We will resolve any
> > incompatibilities with
> > JDK8 asap.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks, thomas
> > >>>
> > >>> On Feb 13, 2013, at 9:03 AM, "Venkatachalam, Vasanth" <
> > Vasanth.Venkatachalam at amd.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I noticed that I had to use a JDK7 VM to build Graal.
> > >>>> I wasn't able to build it with JDK8. Is there a workaround for
> > >>>> this,
> > or does Graal require a JDK7 host VM?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If Graal only supports JDK7, are there plans to make it
> > >>>> compatible
> > with JDK8?
> > >>>> We're looking to leverage Graal for the Sumatra project
> > >>>> (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/sumatra/)
> > >>>> This work requires being able to compile JDK8 lambda constructs
> > >>>> for
> > the GPU.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Vasanth
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>