RFR: clarify how to set the affects versions

[Alexey Ivanov]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 06:28:26 GMT, David Holmes <dholmes at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> moved together information on how the set the affects version and the meaning of the (Rel)-na and (Rel)-wnf labelss
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 96:
> 
>> 94: ##### Usage of (Rel)-na Label
>> 95: 
>> 96: Labels of the form [12-na]{.jbs-label} or [18-na]{.jbs-label} should be used when a bug is not applicable to a more recent release family.
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
> Labels of the form [Rel-na]{.jbs-label} (e.g. [18-na]{.jbs-label}) should be used when a bug is not applicable to a more recent release family. For example, given:

Maybe, use an LTS version in the example: 17-na?

> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 110:
> 
>> 108: ##### Usage of (Rel)-wnf Label
>> 109: 
>> 110: labels of the form [7-wnf]{.jbs-label} or [9-wnf]{.jbs-label} should be used to indicate that a bug is not going to be fixed in a release that it is applicable to, both explicitly ([11-wnf]{.jbs-label} states it won't be fixed in JDK 11) or implicitly ([11-wnf]{.jbs-label} indicates it won't be fixed in JDK 8).
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
> Labels of the form [Rel-wnf]{.jbs-label} (e.g. [9-wnf]{.jbs-label}) should be used to indicate that a bug is not going to be fixed in a release that it is applicable to, or any earlier releases. For example, [11-wnf]{.jbs-label} states it won't be fixed in JDK 11 and implicitly indicates it won't be fixed in JDK 8 either).

I suggest replacing `9-wnf` with `11-wnf` — the entire item would look consistent.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/119#discussion_r1495561798
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/119#discussion_r1495563938