RFR: clarify how to set the affects versions [v2]

[calnan]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:12:28 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 96:
>> 
>>> 94: ##### Usage of (Rel)-na Label
>>> 95: 
>>> 96: Labels of the form [12-na]{.jbs-label} or [18-na]{.jbs-label} should be used when a bug is not applicable to a more recent release family.
>> 
>> Suggestion:
>> 
>> Labels of the form [Rel-na]{.jbs-label} (e.g. [18-na]{.jbs-label}) should be used when a bug is not applicable to a more recent release family. For example, given:
>
> Maybe, use an LTS version in the example: 17-na?

done

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 110:
>> 
>>> 108: ##### Usage of (Rel)-wnf Label
>>> 109: 
>>> 110: labels of the form [7-wnf]{.jbs-label} or [9-wnf]{.jbs-label} should be used to indicate that a bug is not going to be fixed in a release that it is applicable to, both explicitly ([11-wnf]{.jbs-label} states it won't be fixed in JDK 11) or implicitly ([11-wnf]{.jbs-label} indicates it won't be fixed in JDK 8).
>> 
>> Suggestion:
>> 
>> Labels of the form [Rel-wnf]{.jbs-label} (e.g. [9-wnf]{.jbs-label}) should be used to indicate that a bug is not going to be fixed in a release that it is applicable to, or any earlier releases. For example, [11-wnf]{.jbs-label} states it won't be fixed in JDK 11 and implicitly indicates it won't be fixed in JDK 8 either).
>
> I suggest replacing `9-wnf` with `11-wnf` — the entire item would look consistent.

done

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/119#discussion_r1496250934
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/119#discussion_r1496250763