RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]

[Jesper Wilhelmsson]

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:07:41 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aivanov at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Jesper Wilhelmsson has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Fix typo in label
>
> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 340:
> 
>> 338: ### Closing incomplete issues
>> 339: 
>> 340: As mentioned above, issues that lack the information needed to investigate the problem are placed in status [Resolved]{.jbs-value} - [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}. Triage teams should monitor incomplete issues in their area and if needed ping the relevant person. When new information is received, the bug should be returned to status [Open]{.jbs-value}. If the required information hasn't been obtained within reasonable time (3-4 weeks) the bug should be closed as [Incomplete]{.jbs-value}.
> 
> Does “…the bug should be closed…” imply that the *Resolved* status changes to *Closed*?

Yes.

> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
> 
>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>> 434:       *(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label} is used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
> 
> Should the section be expanded for update releases? The labels like `jdk12u-fix-request` and `jdk24u-fix-request` are constantly used to [request approval for backporting](https://openjdk.org/guide/#requesting-approvals-for-backports) an update release.
> 
> The `jdk##-fix-request` and `jdk##u-fix-request` are similar, but they have a different role in the OpenJDK Project.

I'd be happy to include such an update. Could you write the text, either here in a comment or as a separate change?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1996470178
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r1996470497