RFR: No localization in RDP2 [v2]

[Alexey Ivanov]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:51:25 GMT, Jesper Wilhelmsson <jwilhelm at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> src/guide/jbs-jdk-bug-system.md line 434:
>> 
>>> 432:                            [*(Rel)*[-fix-no]{.jbs-label}]{#rel-fix-no}</td>
>>> 433:     <td class="dictionary">
>>> 434:       *(Rel)*[-fix-request]{.jbs-label} is used in ramp down phase 2 to indicate that an issue would be of interest to be integrated into release *(Rel)*. E.g., [jdk12-fix-request]{.jbs-label}
>> 
>> Should the section be expanded for update releases? The labels like `jdk12u-fix-request` and `jdk24u-fix-request` are constantly used to [request approval for backporting](https://openjdk.org/guide/#requesting-approvals-for-backports) an update release.
>> 
>> The `jdk##-fix-request` and `jdk##u-fix-request` are similar, but they have a different role in the OpenJDK Project.
>
> I'd be happy to include such an update. Could you write the text, either here in a comment or as a separate change?

Yeah, it makes sense to expand the section in another PR.

> I don't think so. Your suggestion would require a comma after "note", and I don't think that sentence would be easier to read.

You're right. The sentence is easier to understand with both “that” on their own places.

> It could be simplified by removing "that are" (the second that) instead.

No, the second “that” can't be removed because it's the subject of the dependent sentence “that are made late in the release” which describes _changes_.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r2002007684
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/guide/pull/146#discussion_r2002004271