Request for reviews (XL): 6919934: JSR 292 needs to support x86 C1

[Christian Thalinger]

On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 12:05 -0800, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> > I can change it yes, but I'm really not sure yet if we need to preserve
> > the SP on SPARC.
> 
> I don't think they are and I'd rather not have XXX comments lying
> around.  If they are needed then I suspect you'll figure it out
> because of a new bug report, not because the comment is there.

Since I've already started the SPARC C1 port I know that we need to
implement these methods.  I removed the comment and put an
Unimplemented() there instead.

> > No, RSI is an argument register on 64 bit and I didn't know which one to
> > use instead.  I guess any callee saved might do it?
> 
> Yep.

I used R14.

Here is an updated webrev and I will push that one:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6919934/webrev.02/

-- Christian