Review Request: Add fast bytecode support to C++ interpreter

[Edward Nevill]

On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 11:01 -0700, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> I think that makes sense.  So this isn't really adding support for fast bytecodes but providing a fallback path for a system with two different interpreters, one which supports fast bytecodes and one which doesn't.  I think it would be best to keep this ifdef ZERO.  What about this:
> 

Correct. I am happy with your proposed modifications.

Regards,
Ed.