RFR 8214239 (S): Missing x86_64.ad patterns for clearing and setting long vector bits

Vladimir Kozlov vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com
Mon Nov 11 23:35:45 UTC 2019


Bernard,

Testing passed clean. After second review it can be pushed.

Thanks,
Vladimir

On 11/11/19 12:31 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> It is fine. I will submit our internal testing (more tiers) and let you know results.
> 
> Vladimir
> 
> On 11/11/19 12:24 PM, B. Blaser wrote:
>> I pushed it to jdk/submit and all seems to be OK:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/submit/rev/cbe81ae81095
>>
>> Should we run more tests?
>>
>> Bernard
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 21:16, Vladimir Kozlov
>> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/11/19 12:14 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>>> Very good. What testing you did?
>>>
>>> I mean in addition to tier1.
>>>
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Vladimir
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 11, 2019, at 9:23 AM, B. Blaser <bsrbnd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review the following fix for [1] which has been extensively
>>>>> discussed in [2]:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bsrbnd/jdk8214239/webrev.00/
>>>>>
>>>>> It includes:
>>>>> * Vladimir's requested changes about instruction encoding and testing
>>>>> along with:
>>>>> * John's suggested complementary benchmark following Sandhya's note
>>>>> regarding throughput.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks (hotspot:tier1 is OK on Linux/x86_64),
>>>>> Bernard
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214239
>>>>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2019-November/035699.html
>>>>


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list