[15] RFR(T) 8242357: [JVMCI] Incorrect use of JVMCI_CHECK_ on return statement
Liu, Xin
xxinliu at amazon.com
Sat Apr 18 00:36:43 UTC 2020
LGTM. I used to backport a similar change (exceptions.hpp) to jdk8u.
I also use regex to scan the whole source code, I think it’s the only place in hotspot.
Thanks,
--lx
On 4/17/20, 5:02 PM, "hotspot-compiler-dev on behalf of Vladimir Kozlov" <hotspot-compiler-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8242357
CHECK macros can't be used on a return statement - they expand to include code after the return [2] and so have no affect.
Fix:
src/hotspot/share/jvmci/jvmciEnv.hpp
@@ -262,7 +262,8 @@
char* as_utf8_string(JVMCIObject str, char* buf, int buflen);
JVMCIObject create_string(Symbol* str, JVMCI_TRAPS) {
- return create_string(str->as_C_string(), JVMCI_CHECK_(JVMCIObject()));
+ JVMCIObject s = create_string(str->as_C_string(), JVMCI_CHECK_(JVMCIObject()));
+ return s;
}
I tried to find similar cases but it was the only one.
Clang -Wunreachable-code-aggressive does not catch this case.
Tested hs-tier1,hs-tier3-graal
Thanks,
Vladimir
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/90882ba9f488/src/hotspot/share/jvmci/jvmciExceptions.hpp#l48
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list